User talk:Salimfadhley

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2014/May; 2014/June; 2014/July; 2014/August; 2014/December; 2015/March; 2015/September; 2015/November; 2016/January; 2016/June; 2016/August; 2016/November; 2017/May; 2017/August; 2017/September; 2017/November; 2017/December; 2018/January; 2018/February; 2018/March; 2018/May; 2018/June; 2018/July; 2018/August; 2018/September; 2018/December; 2019/February; 2019/April; 2019/June; 2019/August; 2019/September; 2019/October; 2019/November; 2020/March; 2020/June; 2020/September; 2020/October; 2020/November; 2020/December; 2021/January; 2021/February; 2021/March; 2021/June; 2021/July; 2021/August; 2021/September; 2021/October; 2021/November; 2021/December; 2022/January; 2022/February; 2022/March; 2022/April; 2022/May; 2022/June; 2022/July; 2022/August; 2022/October; 2023/January; 2023/March; 2023/April; 2023/June; 2023/August; 2023/September; 2024/January; 2024/May; 2024/September; 2024/October;

Before you leave comments or feedback please login! Anonymous comments might be ignored!

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Final Experiment (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Leading part.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Final Experiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 06:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Salimfadhley! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Lemonaka 06:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Essex Coroner Kidnapping Plot (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Essex Coroner Kidnapping Plot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Essex Coroner Kidnapping Plot (January 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Josedimaria was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Should be merged.

Jõsé^hola 21:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Josedimaria, thanks for your review - I would appreciate your feedback on this. The subject was covered by local newspapers at the time. A review of the sources show more than just passing mentions of the unsuccessful plot to kidnap a local government official. I'd appreciate your guidaice, specifically how do you feel I am missing the mark on this one? Salimfadhley (talk) 13:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you just seeing it after 30 days?

There are several reasons:

Another reason why this draft was rejected is that unsuccessful assassinations or kidnappings are not notable on Wikipedia unless of a high degree or involves personalities who have a page on Wikipedia - it is not similar to an assassination/kidnapping plot of a popular world leader (US, Australia, Brazil) that would draw worldwide attraction.

Lastly, why the article is "rejected" is because the victim of the kidnapping plot does not even have a page on Wikipedia which otherwise would have qualified for a merge.

If you feel my reasons are not sufficient enough, you can put it up for discussion at the request section. Jõsé^hola 19:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's perfectly reasonable, I was just looking to understand what standard you are applying. It's clearly not the same as an assassination of a world leader, this was a small crime which was widely reported but only on national media. Could you kindly link me to the policy that supports this idea, as I am not familiar with it: "assassinations or kidnappings are not notable on Wikipedia unless of a high degree or involves personalities who have a page on Wikipedia". Thank you. Salimfadhley (talk) 10:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]